two years of thoughtlessness, lesser evils and judging others

July 16th, 2006

Something I read and found about two years ago, but which is still relevant, especially those parts about self-reflection and judging yourself and others. Absolute moral relativity, often found in certain quarters of academia, and often out of good intent – for who are we to judge? But a person without judgement is a person without responsibility – hidden high up in the ivory tower, looking down upon the massacres. When is intervention justified and how do we reach consensus about it?

“There exists in our society a widespread fear of judging . . . [B]ehind the unwillingness to judge lurks the suspicion that no one is a free agent, and hence the doubt that anyone is responsible or could be expected to answer for what he has done. . . . Who am I to judge? actually means We’re all alike, equally bad, and those who try, or pretend that they try, to remain halfway decent are either saints or hypocrites, and in either case should leave us alone. Hence the huge outcry the moment anyone fixes specific blame on some particular person.”

“Socrates provided her model of thinking. In the agora or the gymnasium, he questioned others to see what ideas would not stand up. When he was alone, thinking continued as an internal version of that same dialogue. It was “the silent dialogue between me and myself,” Arendt wrote. It made the thinker like two speakers internally, “two-in-one,” always testing possible beliefs and actions, grappling with the reality of the outer situation by a kind of inner company.”

“But we would think it arrogant for one person to stand up and coolly say to another-”I, so-and-so, having considered it carefully, judge that what you, Mr. X, did, was morally wrong. I need no more authority to judge you than the fact that I am a fellow human being, and that I have judged by good examples, and asked myself what I, myself, could not live with doing.” Of course, it would be a very curious world in which one constantly dared to judge others, and not so much one’s enemies. As Arendt always insisted, the real moral issue was never with one’s enemies, who like the Nazis could be so obviously evil) but with one’s friends, and those one loved.”

Posted in classics, politics, thinking

2 Responses

  1. vivace

    “But a person without judgement is a person without responsibility” – this is soooo nice…..
    u speak of things that touches my heart…..

  2. goose

    we judge others becuz we’re trying to find the self that we “want to be”, isn’t that true? who cares about judging others… what do we REALLY care about OTHER people’s characters or lack thereof… wahaha… all we are tryin to find is the guideline for how we should act/be. how much decadence & self-indulgence & vanity & selfishness are we allowed to have before we cross the line & start looking like *that* fool over there who seems SOOOO dang WRONG at the moment, LOLZZZZZZZZZZ!

book and sword : gratitude and revenge

is the first novel written by Jin Yong. The protagonist is Chan Ka Lok, who is the leader of the Red Flower Society. The book title refers to Ka Lok being famous for being well-versed in culture and martial arts, but also for having to make a difficult ethical decision. My father named me and my brother after him.

The subtitle is from a poem Desiderata